Guía práctica de seguimiento y manejo del paciente con asma grave tratado con biológicos / Practical guide for the follow-up and management of patients with severe asthma treated with biologics

El manejo del asma grave descontrolada con biológicos es un área de extrema dificultad, dada la escasez de información respecto a los criterios de inicio de los mismos, las variables a evaluar para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de su manejo, los puntos de corte para determinar el momento oportuno para cambiar o agregar otro biológico y el proceso para disminuir o retirar los esteroides. Esta revisión incorpora la información más reciente y realiza una propuesta con base en ella.

The management of severe uncontrolled asthma with biologics is an area of extreme difficulty given the scarcity of information regarding their starting criteria, the variables to be evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of their management, the cut-off points to determine the timing to change or add another biological and the process to decrease or withdraw steroids. This review incorporates the latest information and makes a proposal based on it

Research status of monoclonal antibody targeted therapy in children with severe bronchial asthma / 中国综合临床

Monoclonal antibody is a new treatment for severe asthma in children.It can selectively act on specific cytokines or pathways in the inflammatory cascade of asthma to block the inflammatory reaction, so as to reduce the number of acute attacks of asthma, reduce the dosage of drugs, and improve lung function.The main adverse reactions included injection site reaction and upper respiratory tract infection.At present, monoclonal antibodies for children include Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, Benralizumab, Reslizumab and Dupilumab.Although the efficacy of monoclonal antibody in children with asthma is obvious, its long-term effect and safety still need to be further confirmed by a large number of clinical studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ：A Meta-analysis / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE：To systematic ally ev aluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma ，and to provide evidenced-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS ：Retrieved from PubMed ， Embase，Cochrane Library ，ClinicalTrials.gov，CNKI，VIP and Wanfang database ，randomized controlled trials （RCTs）about benralizumab+routine treatment （trial group ）versus placebo+routine treatment （control group ）were collected during the inception to Dec. 2020. The relevant references were also retrieved manually. After data extraction ，the quality of included literatures was evaluated with bias risk evaluation tool 2.0 recommended by Cochrane systematic evaluator manual 6.1. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Rev Man 5.4 software. RESULTS ：Totally 5 studies involving 2 646 patients were included. Results of Meta-analysis showed that acute exacerbation rate of asthma [RR ＝0.67，95％ CI（0.61，0.74），P＜0.000 01]，asthma control questionnaire score [MD ＝－0.29，95％CI（－0.37，－0.21），P＜0.000 01] and the incidence of severe adverse event [RR ＝0.67，95％CI （0.53，0.84），P＝0.000 6] in trial group were significantly lower than control group. FEV 1[MD＝0.13，95％CI（0.09，0.17），P＜0.000 01] and asthma quality of life questionnaire score [MD ＝0.23，95％CI（0.13，0.33），P＜0.000 01] in trial group were significantly higher than control group. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of adverse event between 2 groups [RR ＝0.97，95％CI （0.92，1.02），P＝0.28]. CONCLUSIONS ：Benralizumab is effective and safe in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Due to the relatively limited data ，this conclusion needs to be confirmed by more studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab for Korean Patients With Severe, Uncontrolled Eosinophilic Asthma

PURPOSE: In the Phase III SIROCCO trial (NCT01928771), benralizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and improved lung function and symptoms for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this subgroup analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of benralizumab for Korean patients in SIROCCO. METHODS: SIROCCO was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 1,204 patients aged 12–75 years with severe asthma uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABA). Patients received benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W; first 3 doses Q4W) or placebo Q4W for 48 weeks. The primary analysis population comprised patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL. This subgroup analysis evaluated Korean patients from this group. RESULTS: Of 122 Korean patients randomized, 86 had blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL. Benralizumab reduced the annual asthma exacerbation rate by 70% (Q4W: rate estimate 0.79, rate ratio 0.30 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.13–0.65], nominal P = 0.003; n = 28) and 85% (Q8W: rate estimate 0.40, rate ratio 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06–0.36], nominal P < 0.001; n = 30) vs. placebo (rate estimate 2.67, n = 28). Prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second was increased with benralizumab treatment by 0.270 L (Q4W: 95% CI, 0.039–0.500, nominal P = 0.023; n = 28) and 0.362 L (Q8W: 95% CI, 0.143–0.582, nominal P = 0.002; n = 30) vs. placebo (n = 27). Total asthma symptom score was similar for patients receiving either benralizumab Q4W (−0.27 [95% CI, −0.83 to 0.30], nominal P = 0.356; n = 27) or benralizumab Q8W (0.10 [95% CI, −0.44 to 0.65], nominal P = 0.708; n = 30) vs. placebo (n = 28). Drug-related adverse events were experienced by 2%, 8%, and 5% of patients in the placebo, benralizumab Q4W, and benralizumab Q8W arms. CONCLUSIONS: Benralizumab reduced annual asthma exacerbation rates, increased lung function, and was well-tolerated by Korean patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials / 医学前沿

Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor α to deplete blood eosinophils and improve the clinical outcomes of allergic asthma. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different doses of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma. All randomized controlled trials involving benralizumab treatment for patients with eosinophilic asthma, which were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published until January 2017, as well as the rate of asthmatic exacerbation, pulmonary functionality, asthma control, quality of life scores, and adverse events were included. Randomized-effect models were used in the meta-analysis to calculate the pooled mean difference, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals. Five studies involving 1951 patients were identified. Compared with the placebo, benralizumab treatment demonstrated significant improvements in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores, decreased asthmatic exacerbation and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) scores. Benralizumab treatment was also not associated with increased adverse events. These findings indicated that benralizumab can be safely used to improve FEV1, enhance patient symptom control and quality of life, and reduce the risk of exacerbations and ACQ-6 scores in patients with eosinophilic asthma. Furthermore, our meta-analysis showed that benralizumab with 30 mg (every eight weeks) dosage can improve the health-related quality of life and appear to be more effective than 30 mg (every four weeks) dosage. Overall, data indicated that the optimal dosing regimen for benralizumab was possibly 30 mg (every eight weeks).